OUTBREAK OF BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA INFECTION: A SYSTEMATIC STUDY IN A HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY UNIT OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL FROM EASTERN INDIA.
Baul

Outbreak of Burkholderia Cepacia Infection: a Systematic Study in a Hematolo-oncology Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital from Eastern India

Shuvra Neel Baul1, Rajib De1, Prakas Kumar Mandal1, Swagnik Roy2, Tuphan Kanti Dolai1 and Prantar Chakrabarti1.

1 Faculty; Department of Haematology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata.
2 Department of Microbiology, KPC Medical College and Hospital; Jadavpur, Kolkata

Correspondence to: Rakas Kumar Mandal, Department of Hematology, Nrs Medical College; Kolkata. E-mail: prakas70@gmail.com

Published: September 1, 2018
Received: March 9, 2018
Accepted: July 20, 2018
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2018, 10(1): e2018051 DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2018.051
This article is available on PDF format at: 

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Burkholderia cepacia, an aerobic gram-negative bacillus, is a frequent colonizer of fluids used in the hospital ward. It poses little risk of infection to healthy people; however it is a known important opportunistic pathogen causing morbidity and mortality due to its intrinsic resistance to most of the antibiotics in hospitalized patients. Small hospital outbreaks are frequent. B. cepacia may occur as an opportunistic infection in hemato-oncology patients. Here we present an outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia infection in hematology ward of our institute.
Methods. Febrile episodes as defined by IDSA guideline, 2010 were followed, and blood for culture and sensitivity was sent in all the events. The culture was done by an automated method using Bactalert 3d Biomeriux & sensitivity pattern by Microscan Siemens method and subsequently detected by PCR based method.
Results. During September 2016 to February 2017 (six months), a total of 498 blood cultures were sent during febrile episodes. Out of which 60 (12%) came out to be positive for different microorganisms. Out of all positive cultures, Burkholderia cepacia was detected in 29 (48%) patients, which reduced drastically following the change in antibiotic administration practice. All isolates showed sensitivity to pipercillin+tazobactum, cefoperazone+sulbactum, fluoroquinolones, cotrimoxazole and carbapenems and resistance to polymyxin B and colistin. With timely intervention by appropriate intravenous antibiotics as per culture sensitivity result and change in antibiotic preparation practice, overall mortality was low 1 (4%) out of 29 culture positive episodes.
Conclusion. Change of antibiotic preparation practice was the key to control this outbreak, and overall mortality was low.



Introduction

Burkholderia cepacia (B. cepacia) is an aerobic gram-negative bacillus which is catalase negative, non-lactose fermenting gram-negative bacterium[1] B. cepacia is frequent colonizer of fluids used in the hospital ward (e.g., irrigation solutions, intravenous fluids, antiseptic solutions).[2] B. cepacia poses little risk of infection to healthy people; however it is a known important opportunistic pathogen causing morbidity and mortality due to its intrinsic resistance to most of the antibiotics in hospitalized patients.[3] Small hospital outbreaks are frequent and are usually due to single contaminated source such as disinfectant, intravenous solutions, nebulizer solutions, mouthwash, and medical devices, including respiratory therapy equipment.[2,4]
 Infection with B. cepacia is uncommon in the hematological setting. However, B. cepacia may occur as an opportunistic infection in hemato-oncology patients.[5] Here we present an outbreak of B. cepacia infection in hematology ward of our institute.

Materials and Methods

Setting and patients: Department of Haematology, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College, and Hospital, a state-run medical college under Government of West Bengal, is a dedicated Haematology & Haemato-oncology set up where admitted patients (either neutropenic or non-neutropenic) having febrile episodes as a consequence of chemotherapy or other intensive treatments. Febrile neutropenia was defined as per Infectious Disease Society America (IDSA) 2010 guidelines.[6] Considering the immune-compromised status in these group of patients, we also routinely do perform blood culture test in any febrile episodes even in non- neutropenic state. We collaborated with the Microbiology Department of KPC Medical College and Hospital, Jadavpur within the same city of Kolkata for microbiological assessment of the specimens.
Bacterial cultures and identification. This is a retrospective analysis of total 498 febrile neutropenic episodes during the period from September 2016 to February 2017 (six months). Blood cultures were sent in all febrile episodes in Bactalert FA plus culture bottles (bioMerieux, France). A standard protocol was followed for proper storage of culture bottles as mentioned in manufacturer instructions. Blood was collected with the utmost sterility, and 10 ml blood was cultured in each BacT/ALERT bottles. Further identification of microorganisms and sensitivity pattern to antibiotics were carried out by Microscan NBC42panel (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, West Sacramento, CA, USA).
Environmental sampling and culture. As part of the outbreak investigation, the following items were cultured: oxygen masks, stock materials of fluids for intravenous (IV) administration, venous catheters, intravenous sets, antiseptic solutions, a swab from hospital floor. These environmental samples were primarily cultured in 10 mL Brain Heart Infusion broth (HIMEDIA LAB, INDIA) and B. cepacia Agar Base and B. cepacia Selective Supplement. CODE: SR0189 and CODE: CM0995; manufactured by Oxoid Scientific (Thermo), UK.
B. cepacia complex (Bcc) species identification and assessment of clonal relatedness: We used conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to identify the organism; the details of primers used are given table 1, where we followed the PCR method for Burkholderia as per Lynch report.[7] He reported two sets of primer pairs detecting Burkholderia species and the second one specific for Bcc. 20 µL mixture was prepared using 200 µM of dNTP, 1.5 Mm MgCl2, 50 pmol of each primer, 1.25 units of Taq polymerase and 1X PCR buffer. The PCR was performed on a gradient PCR (Verity, Applied Biosystems) by the following programme: 96°C for 4 minutes, followed by 35 cycles at 96°C, 59°C and 72°C each for 1 minute and lastly 59°C for 2 minutes.


Table 1 Table 1. Details of primers used for identification of Burkholderia Cepacia complex (Bcc) species identification and assessment of clonal relatedness as per Lynch protocol

Genotyping. DNA polymorphisms of all isolates were evaluated by PFGE (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) with specimen I, 20 DNA patterns were compared by standard DNA marker interpreted by visual inspection. PCR products were separated on 0.8% (wt/vol) agarose gels in 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (pH 8.0).
For every case, the MIC50 and MIC90 values against each antibiotic were recorded meticulously as per the CLSI guidelines,[8] and the sensitivity/resistance pattern was determined.

Results

This outbreak occurred in our hematology ward from September 2016 to February, 2017. All patients included in this study were having various hematological malignancies (as shown in figure 1A) including acute leukemia (ALL, AML, MPAL) and high-grade lymphomas (DLBCL). As shown in figure 1B, the patients were on different intensive chemotherapy protocols including BFM-90, UKALL, R-CODOX-M. All patients had a central venous catheter (CVC’s), the majority a peripherally introduced central catheter (PICC). The dressings at the insertion site were changed regularly by using povidone-iodine solution for antisepsis. The demographic profile of the patients during febrile episodes are shown in table 2. Mean age, mean total leukocyte count (TLC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of the patients were 21 years (range: 6-48), 1440/μl (range: 640-5000) and 620/μl (300-2800).

Figure 1 Figures 1A and 1B.  Figure 1A shows the distribution of cases with hematological malignancies, Figure 1B reveals an account of different chemotherapy protocols used in different hematological malignancies.

Table 2 Table 2. Baseline characteristics of the patients (n=29) with Burkholderia infection. 

Total of 498 febrile episodes occurred during this period. Blood culture was positive in 60 episodes representing only 12%. There was the growth of B. cepacia in 29 episodes of febrile neutropenia. So, out of 60 positive culture episodes, B. cepacia represented 48% of all culture-positive organisms. On further analysis, B. cepacia alone was the major pathogen isolated. On genotyping with the forward and reverse primer used for clonal related of B. cepacia complex, we first got a gene product of 424 bp size that was further characterized by using the specific primer for the species identification as mentioned in table 1 and got a gene product of 117 bp size. And, in all cases, we could confirm the clonal relatedness to Burkholderia and the species identified as Bcc.
For every case, the MIC50 and MIC90 value against each antibiotic were noted as per the CLSI guidelines. Amongst the most resistant group of antibiotics (cephalosporins), specially ceftazidime showed MIC50 and MIC90 values of 2 and 32 μg/ml, respectively (sensitive ≤8 μg/ml and resistant ≥32 μg/ml according to CLSI guideline). Likewise, the MIC50 and MIC90 values against each antibiotic were noted meticulously.
Depending upon the sensitivity pattern of microorganisms, as an institutional policy, within one hour of onset of febrile episodes, we use to start initial antibiotic therapy with either piperacillin-tazobactam or cefoperazone-sulbactam intravenously. After the culture reports were available, either we continued with the antibiotic started initially or changed according to the sensitivity pattern. The sensitivity pattern of 
B. cepacia to various antibiotics was analyzed in detail and analysis showed that the organism was sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, cotrimoxazole and chloramphenicol (Figure 2). On further analysis of the resistance pattern of B. cepacia, we found that it was resistant to aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, third and fourth generation cephalosporins, colistin and polymyxin B and few had shown intermediate sensitivity pattern (Figure 2). For those, initially started with cefepime/amikacin, subsequently changed to the appropriate antibiotic as soon as the culture report was made available.

Figure 2 Figure 2. Risk Factors for infections in MDS High-risk. += risk factor; + =no risk factor.

One patient of acute myeloid leukemia on day10 of induction chemotherapy with B. cepacia infection died during the study period. This patient had also CVC induced thrombosis and possible fungal infection in lungs as suggested by ground glass pattern of infiltration in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In all other 28 episodes, patients responded to appropriate antibiotics as per culture and sensitivity pattern. To identify the possible sources of infection culture samples were sent from the hospital floor, walls, and antiseptic solutions. No growth of B. cepacia was identified from any site.
Our tertiary care teaching hospital with hematology-oncology care facility catering to people of low socio-economic status mostly, have many resources constraints such as- provision/facility of no separate room for the patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy sharing multiple beds in a single room, common bathroom, very low nurse-patient ratio. On further departmental inquiry for the possible cause of this outbreak, it was revealed that the health care providers used to prepare the intravenous antibiotics at late night supposed to be given in the next morning and store in the refrigerator. Since Bcc is an organism with a capacity to grow in antiseptic solutions, it might have grown in prepared antibiotic solutions. So we considered these practice could have precipitated the 
B. cepacia outbreak. This practice was stopped with our intervention following which Burkholderia outbreak came down sharply from 48% to 9% in the next three months (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Figure 3. Change in Burkholderia outbreak before and after intervention (change in antibiotic preparation practice). 


Discussion

In our study, we found that B. cepacia infection is an opportunistic gram-negative infection in patients with hematological malignancy receiving chemotherapy. Such outbreaks are not uncommon.[9] Fever with chills and rigor was the universal manifestation in all episodes as initial presentation. In a recent study in febrile neutropenia with hematological malignancy done by Mandal PK et al[10] from eastern part of India showed that, eight commonest isolates are Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.10 %), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-12.82 %), Acinetobacter species (11.53 %), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (10.25 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.97 %), Escherichia coli (8.97 %), ESBL E. coli (6.41 %), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA-6.41 %).
B. cepacia is a gram-negative organism and is a common infection in patients with cystic fibrosis[1
1] with lung involvement or chronic granulomatous disease, usually due to contamination of medical devices or products. Its intrinsic resistance to many disinfectants, antiseptic solutions, and antibiotics makes infection control particularly problematic.[12] Though many reports of Bcc outbreaks are there in intensive care units, hemodialysis clinic, and also oncology departments, but reports regarding hematology patients are few.[8,12,13] The very pertinent issues regarding these organisms is that the virulence of sepsis is no different from other gram-negative organism and considering the prolonged hospital stay of our patients the organism may become multi-antibiotic resistant.[14] Moreover Burkholderia outbreak can occur due to the growth of the organism in saline, antiseptic solutions as established by others.[2,4]
Another very interesting fact about 
B. cepacia infection is that cross-transmission is the very common mode of spread although all the studies are in patients with cystic fibrosis.[15] While investigating an outbreak of B. cepacia bacteremia in a tertiary care center by Abdelfattah R et al.[16], B. cepacia was isolated from the blood cultures of 14 patients resulting from contamination of the gel applied to the ultrasound probe used to guide the insertion of a central venous catheter. Gill JS et al[17] from a tertiary care hospital in India reported 17 cases of cardiac pacemaker pocket infection including multidrug-resistant B. cepacia (n=3) infection and concluded that every hospital should formulate their antibiotic policy based on the pattern of the hospital flora and their drug sensitivity.
All possible sources from our ward were cultured, and no other causative source was identified and thus, strengthened our proposal of overnight refrigeration of prepared intravenous antibiotics was a possible cause for the outbreak of 
B. cepacia.
We very meticulously noted the MIC50 and MIC90 values against every antibiotic as per CLSI guidelines. Though other studies showed sensitivity to ceftazidime,[11,18] but our study showed resistance to this antibiotic including many other cephalosporins as shown in figure 3. As shown in the study by Vardi et al[12], the organisms had shown resistance to polymyxin B, Imipenem, and aminoglycosides; our study also showed a similar type of resistance to the antibiotics except for imipenem (including all other carbapenems) which had shown excellent sensitivity. All the patients received empirical antibiotics with Cefoperazone-Sulbactum or Piperacillin-Tazobactum and became afebrile within three days of intravenous antibiotic therapy. We didn’t have to escalate to carbapenems in any of our patients. Antibiotics were continued for 10-14 days depending on the clinical scenario, and the repeat blood culture report was negative. As shown in table 2, the patients in the study had a mean ANC of 600/μl (range: 300-2800). Thus, many patients had no neutropenia at the onset of fever. And this signifies that patients may get infected with opportunistic organisms like 
B. cepacia due to the immune-compromised status related to primary hematological malignancy and/or chemotherapy, even if the patient may not be in neutropenic phase.
When we analyzed our outcome regarding mortality related to this outbreak, it was not disappointing. Only one patient with B. cepacia sepsis suffering from acute myeloid leukemia died of sepsis on day 10 of her chemotherapy with DA 3+7 standard protocol. The death cannot surely be attributed to B. cepacia sepsis as she also had developed possible fungal pneumonia with multi-organ failure.
We work in a tertiary care university hospital with hematology-oncology care facility catering to people of low socio-economic status, mostly. Due to obvious reasons, there are many resource constraints such as- provision/facility of no separate room for the patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, multiple beds in a single room with very little inter-bed distance, common toilet facility, very low nurse-patient ratio. On trying to search for the possible cause of this outbreak, it was suddenly discovered that the health care providers used to reconstitute the intravenous antibiotics and store them in the syringes late at night in anticipation of administration of the drug on the next morning. The reconstituted antibiotics used to be stored in the refrigerator. Since Bcc is an organism with a capacity to grow in antiseptic solutions, it might have grown in prepared antibiotic solutions. So we hypothesized that this practice could have precipitated the Bcc outbreak. In our urgency to save the lives of the patients, the practice was immediately discontinued, and the intervention resulted in the incidence coming down sharply from 48% to 9% in the next three months (Figure 3). On hindsight, we realized that in our enthusiasm to act fast, we had not sent the suspected fluid for culture and sensitivity. And, we successfully managed to control the propagation of this outbreak further by changing our antibiotic preparation practice.

Conclusion

B. cepacia, an opportunistic infection initially reported in patients of cystic fibrosis with lung involvement or chronic granulomatous disease, usually is due to contamination of medical devices or products. Its intrinsic resistance to many disinfectants, antiseptic solutions, and antibiotics makes infection control particularly problematic. Many reports of Bcc outbreaks are from intensive care units, hemodialysis clinic, and also oncology departments, but reports regarding hematology patients are few. Burkholderia sepsis in any clinical ward is a matter of concern, as it may be considered as a surrogate indicator of deficient barrier nursing care and breach of principles of asepsis. By continued surveillance and active supervision of this unusual outbreak could be checked and thus protected the at-risk immune-compromised patients in the hemato-oncology ward.

References   

  1. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, and Goldberg JB. The multifarious, multi replicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2005; 3: 144–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1085 PMid:15643431
  2. Heo ST, Kim SJ, Jeong YG, et al. Hospital outbreak of Burkholderia stabilis bacteraemia related to contaminated chlorhexidine in haematological malignancy patients with indwelling catheters; J Hosp Infect 2008; 70: 241-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2008.07.019 PMid:18799235  
  3. Baylan O. An opportunistic pathogen frequently isolated from immunocompromised patients: Burkholderia cepacia complex. Mikrobiyol Bul 2012; 46: 304-18. PMid:22639321  
  4. De Smet B, Veng C, Kruy L, et al. Outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia bloodstream infections traced to the use of Ringer lactate solution as multiple-dose vial for catheter flushing, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 832-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12047 PMid:23173820  
  5. T. Mann, D. Ben-David, A. Zlotkin, et al. An outbreak of Burkholderia cenocepacia bacteremia in immunocompromised oncology patients. Infection 2010; 38: 187–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-010-0017-0 PMid:20358245  
  6. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America; Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011; 52: e56–e93. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir073 PMid:21258094
  7. Lynch KH, Dennis JJ. Development of a Species-Specific fur Gene-Based Method for Identification of the Burkholderia Cepacia Complex. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 447-55. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01460-07 PMid:18057135 PMCid:PMC2238088
  8. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twentieth informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Wayne, PA; 2010
  9. Abe K, D'Angelo MT, Sunenshine R, et al. Outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia bloodstream infection at an outpatient hematology and oncology practice. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28: 1311–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/522679 PMid:17926285
  10. Mandal PK, Maji SK, Dolai TK, et al. Micro-organisms Associated with Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Haematological Malignancies in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2015; 31: 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0393-1 PMid:25548444 PMCid:PMC4275510
  11. Jones AM, Dodd ME, Govan JRW, et al. Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans: influence on survival in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2004; 59: 948–51, https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2003.017210 PMid:15516469 PMCid:PMC1746874
  12. Vardi A, Sirigou A, Lalayanni C, et al. An outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia bacteremia in hospitalized hematology patients selectively affecting those with acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41: 312-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.325 PMid:23040605
  13. Metan G, Demiraslan H, Kaynar LG, et al. Factors influencing the early mortality in haematological malignancy patients with nosocomial Gram negative bacilli bacteraemia: a retrospective analysis of 154 cases. Braz J Infect Dis 2013; 17: 143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2012.09.010 PMid:23485438
  14. Burns JL, Wadsworth CD, Barry JJ, et al. Nucleotide sequence analysis of a gene from Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia encoding an outer membrane lipoprotein involved in multiple antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40: 307-313. PMid:8834871 PMCid:PMC163107
  15. Ledson MJ, Gallagher MJ, Corkill JE, Hart CA, Walshaw MJ; Cross infection between cystic fibrosis patients colonised with Burkholderia cepacia. Thorax 1998; 53: 432-36. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.53.5.432 PMid:9708241 PMCid:PMC1745231
  16. Abdelfattah R, Al-Jumaah S, Al-Qahtani A, et al. Outbreak of Burkholderia cepacia bacteraemia in a tertiary care centre due to contaminated ultrasound probe gel. J Hosp Infect 2018; 98: 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.010 PMid:28923373  
  17. Gill JS, Singh N, Khanna SP. Risk of cardiac pacemaker pocket infection in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2017; 60: 185-188. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_190_16 PMid:28631632 
  18. Roy P, Ahmed NH, Biswal I, et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Burkholderia cepacia isolates from Patients with Malignancy. J Glob Infect Dis 2014; 6: 90 - 91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777X.132064 PMid:24926173 PMCid:PMC4049049 


[TOP]