Current knowledge on HIV-associated Plasmablastic Lymphoma

Michele Bibas1 and Jorge J. Castillo2

¹ Clinical Department, Hematology, National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani” Rome, Italy.
² Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard medical School, Boston, USA.

Published: 2014
Received: August 1, 2014
Accepted: September 21, 2014
Meditter J Hematol Infect Dis 2014, 6(1): e2014064, DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2014.064
This article is available on PDF format at:

History

This particular variant of diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was first recognized and described as a new entity in 1992 by Stein in the first edition of the textbook “Neoplastic Hematopathology”.[1] Delecluse and Stein in 1997, drawing from the consultation files of the lymphoma reference center at the Benjamin Franklin Hospital in Berlin, published the first case series of plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) in HIV-positive (HIV+) patients in whom PBL was mainly located in the oral cavity.[2]

Nomenclature

Incidence and Temporal Trends

Since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the incidence of AIDS-related lymphomas (ARLs), initially very high with 449 cases per 100.000 person-years (1996-2000 calendar period) and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 13.2, has dramatically declined. Nowadays, the incidence is near 194 cases per 100.000 person-years (2006-2010 calendar period) with SIR of 10.0.[7] DLBCL remains the main type of cancer that develops in HIV-positive patients.[8]
The incidence of HIV-associated PBL accounts for approximately 2% of all ARLs. However because of the rarity, the exact incidence and temporal trends are unknown.[9] Several case reports and case series have been published to date, accounting for no more than 250 cases. In a Pubmed search using the keywords “plasmablastic” and “lymphoma” and “HIV”, 313 articles were published between 2000 and 2009 (10 years), and 234 articles between 2010 and today (<5 years). It is unclear if the actual incidence of PBL has increased in recent years. This apparent increase in published case reports and series might just be a reflection of an increased awareness of PBL among clinicians.

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of PBL HIV-associated is poorly understood and determined by the complexity of biological interplays between HIV-related immunodeficiency, genetic cellular abnormalities, co-infecting oncogenic viruses and chronic immune activation. In defining diagnostic and treatment strategies, it is of utmost importance to understand not only the molecular mechanism of viral carcinogenesis but also the host counterpart in term of immunologic status of the patient.[10] The contribution of HIV to PBL pathogenesis might develop through four main mechanisms: 1) the duration and the degree of immunodeficiency or immunosuppression; 2) the induction of chronic antigenic stimulation leading to a chronic B-cell proliferation/exhaustion; 3) the loss of immune control of oncogenic herpesvirus as EBV; and 4) an incomplete immune reconstitution or factors unrelated to immune dysfunction.[11]
Degree and duration of immunodeficiency. Time spent with higher viral load and lower CD4 counts plays an important role in the development of ARLs. HIV-positive PBL patients encompassing the pre- and post-ART eras have an average CD4 count at lymphoma presentation around 200 cell/mm³ and an average viral load of 250.000 copies/mL.[12] The reported average duration from HIV diagnosis to PBL diagnosis is 8.9 years.[13]
Chronic antigenic stimulation. HIV infection is characterized by chronic immune activation due to: 1) a persistent antigenic stimulation by viral HIV proteins or other viral co-infections (e.g. Cytomegalovirus and microbial product after microbial translocation in the gut); 2) the presence of a chronic general unresolved inflammatory state. This state can lead to a polyclonal B-cell expansion/dysfunction promoting the emergence of monoclonal B-cell, and to an abnormal production of stimulatory cytokines such IL-6.[14]
Virology. HIV-associated ARL, including PBL, is strongly related to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and near 80% of these lymphoma cells express EBNA1 and EBV-encoded RNAs detected using an in situ hybridization technique, representing then a type I latency pattern.[10-15] Similarly, plasmacytoid Burkitt lymphomas express the same type I EBV latency pattern. In contrast in EBV-associated  DLBCL immunoblastic lymphoma, tumour cells express EBV-encoded LMP1 (indicating a type II latency pattern). Of note, a subset of DLBCL may have a type III latency pattern as proved by the additional expression of the EBNA2 protein.[10]
Molecular Genetics. The potential role of MYC gene rearrangements is currently unclear. This translocation mostly occurs in the context of complex karyotype abnormalities involving as a common partner in translocation the immunoglobulin gene. Of note in contrast of most lymphomas with MYC rearrangement that have a germinal center phenotype, PBL HIV+ have a typical postgerminal center profile, suggesting a distinct role in the pathogenesis.[10] Of clinical interest, this translocation have been identified in near 50% of patients HIV+ with PBL and has been associated with worse outcome.[16]

Clinical Presentations and Features

Diagnosis

Diagnosis requires a properly evaluated tissue biopsy of mass lesion or lymph node. Excisional biopsy is the gold standard; however, because frequently the site of the disease is difficult to access, core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration (FNA) may be performed in conjunction with appropriate ancillary techniques for the differential diagnosis (i.e. flow cytometry, PCR for IgH and TCR gene rearrangements, FISH for major translocations, immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic studies, etc).
Morphology. PBL is characterized by monomorphic cellular proliferation of round to oval-shaped cells with either centrally or eccentrically placed nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in a diffuse sheet-like and cohesive growth pattern (Figure 1). Apoptotic bodies and mitotic figures are frequent, and tangible-body macrophages are easily detectable leading to a starry-sky appearance.[1-2]
Immunophenotype. PBL is a high-grade B-cell lymphoma that arises from post-germinal center B-cell and usually express the characteristic immunophenotype of plasmacytoid terminally differentiated B-cell. As plasmablasts acquire plasma-cell markers (i.e. VS38c, CD38, MUM1/IRF4, CD138, EMA), they lose the leukocyte common antigen (CD45) and their B-cell markers CD20, CD79a, PAX5, and a high proliferation rate reflected by Ki67 expression >80%. (Figure 1). Cytoplasmic immunoglobulins are expressed in near 70% of cases. Interestingly, these lymphomas might express epithelial and endothelial markers such EMA and CD31, posing some problems in differential diagnosis with poorly differentiated solid tumors.[10] Recently, an immunohistochemistry stain for PRDM1/BLIMP1 and XBP1 have been proposed to identify PBL, however this finding remains investigational. [11]
Virology and genetics. HIV-associated PBL is closely linked to EBV infection, and more than 80% of PBL cells express EBV-encoded RNA (EBER-ISH). (Figure 1). MYC rearrangements, like other high-grade B-cell lymphomas of aggressive type, are found in near 50% and frequently correlated with EBV infection and worse prognosis. Molecular analysis of BCL2 and BCL6 are, usually, negative.[12,15] The presence of HHV8 within the sample can indicate a different condition called HHV8-positive PBL arising from multicentric Castleman’s disease.[17]

Figure 1. H&E: Large lymphoid cells with plasmablastic features, haematoxylin and eosin stain (medium and high resolution); IRF4/MUM1: multiple myelomas oncogene 1/interferon regulatory factor 4; EMA: epithelial membrane antigen; KI-67%.  marker of  the growth fraction; EBER, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA; CD20, cluster of differentiation 20 (B-lymphocyte antigen); BCL6, B-cell lymphoma 6; CD138, cluster of differentiation 138 (syndecan-1)

Clinical evaluation and staging. Patients with suspected HIV-associated PBL should have a complete medical history, a careful physical examination of node-bearing areas including Waldeyer’s ring, skin, liver and spleen, and an adequate evaluation of performance status and the presence of B symptoms. Laboratory evaluation should include a complete blood count, chemistry and immunoglobulins profile with kappa and lambda evaluation in plasma and urine. It is of utmost importance to evaluate renal, hepatic and cardiac functions prior intensive chemotherapy and patients should undergo echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac function because of the anthracycline–based chemotherapy, and gastrointestinal endoscopy if symptoms or lesions of suspicious on imaging studies are present. Pregnancy testing in women of childbearing age is mandatory if chemotherapy is planned.
Imaging studies should include whole body contrast-enhanced CT and an MRI of the head.  FDG-PET in HIV associated lymphoma have a limitation in interpretation because the results can be confounded with inflammation and infections typically present in those patients.[26,27] A bone marrow biopsy and aspirate should be performed as involvement by PBL is found in up 25% of patients.[15] Because PBL patients HIV+ are at high risk for presentation or recurrence in the CNS, particularly meninges, a lumbar puncture analyzing the cerebrospinal fluid by flow cytometry, cytology and molecular studies should be performed to check for leptomeningeal lymphoma. The Ann Arbor system is the most commonly used for staging purposes. We recommend the use of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) for risk-stratification.
Differential diagnosis. The morphological differential diagnosis includes poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, plasmablastic variant of Burkitt’s lymphoma and anaplastic plasmacytoma. Differentiating PBLs from anaplastic plasmacytoma may be a diagnostic challenge. In fact highly aggressive plasma cell myeloma and extramedullary plasmacytoma may contain a predominance of plasmablasts with a similar immunophenotype to PBL, but myeloma cells are, usually, EBV negative. The presence high level of serum monoclonal proteins, and bone involvement with radiographically evident lytic lesions favor the diagnosis of myeloma rather than PBL. Plasma cell myeloma and plasmacytoma are very rare in the setting of HIV, and in the few cases reported in the literature a previous progression from MGUS was reported.[21-23] However, the presence of MGUS is frequently encountered in patients at HIV presentation, reflecting dysregulation of the immune system due to the presence of HIV, but almost always MGUS disappears when viral load becomes undetectable.[24-25] Other potential differential diagnoses include CD20-negative aggressive lymphomas such as solid or extracavitary primary effusion lymphoma and ALK+ DLBCL.
HIV disease status. A detailed comprehensive evaluation of HIV disease must be performed including; duration of HIV infection, mode of HIV transmission, prior opportunistic infections, CD4+ cell count and viral load at HIV diagnosis and at diagnosis of lymphoma.[10] A strategic history of HIV viral control and antiretroviral treatment with regards to HIV mutation and resistance should be assessed. In addition, information about HCV, HBV, tuberculosis, malaria, leishmaniasis coinfections and EBV, HHV8, CMV and sexually transmitted diseases are necessary for clinical management and therapeutic decisions.[14]
Fertility preservation counselling and management. Fertility preservation is an essential consideration of cancer management. Because HIV-associated PBL frequently occur  in young patients, this issue should be discussed as early as possible during treatment planning. For male patients, sperm banking should be planned before treatment initiation. Semen cryopreservation is recommended independently of patient’s age, according to their wishes of future paternity. Embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can address the sterility chemo-radiotherapy induced in women, this method it actually the gold standard to preserve female fertility, but requires in vitro fertilization procedure. Freezing ovarian tissue before treatment may be an option (the tissue is harvested with laparoscopy and re-implanted after thawing in the pelvis when needed) but is an experimental method.[28]

Management

First –line treatment. The treatment of PBL HIV-associated has not been standardized as prospective studies to define a standard of care are lacking. It is a common practice to start patients on combination chemotherapy. In the recently updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, the recommendation is to treat HIV+ PBL with intensive regimens as CODOX-M/IVAC, Hyper-CVAD, or DA-EPOCH as possible options. Standard CHOP seems not an adequate therapy.[29] However, CHOP therapy is often given to treat PBL.[14,20] Intensification of induction chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT), thought to be a good option in HIV-negative patients with chemosensitive disease, has also been shown to be feasible also in HIV+ patients.[9,30] Of note, HIV infection alone should not preclude an attempt to obtain stem cell in candidates for ABMT. Chemotherapy plus G-SCF seems to mobilize better than G-CSF alone, and at least 3g/m² of cyclophosphamide is recommended.[31]
New drugs. Because PBL shares many morphologic and immunophenotypic traits with plasmablastic myelomas some studies have reported that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib alone or in combination with chemotherapy may have an antitumor effect in PBL, blocking NFKB or overcoming the typical chemoresistance of this disease. For the same reason, the use of lenalidomide has been reported in PBL. This well-known immunomodulatory agent has proved to be effective as a single agent in aggressive relapsed or refractory HIV-negative patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by enhancing the immune system, with robust response rates. However, the reported outcome, at the case report level, with these new agents are transient.[32,33] Due to the lack of CD20 expression, the use of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, is unlikely to be of benefit, however it could be considered if partial expression of CD20 is detected within the malignant cells.  
Refractory or relapsed patients. Treatment in patients with refractory or relapsed HIV-associated PBL is considered palliative although some cases of long-term survival have been described. In general, a more intensive chemotherapy is planned for relapsed patients, and for fit patients intensification of chemotherapy with AMBT may be an option. Multiple reports from single centers or cooperative groups have been published. Effectiveness of such therapy was not significantly different between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, in term of treatment-related mortality, opportunistic infections, immune recovery, and OS. Of note, allogeneic BMT is a more limited option in HIV-positive relapsed PBLs.[9,30]

Specific Treatment Considerations

Supportive therapy. More vigorous supportive care is necessary for HIV-infected patients than in patients who are not infected with HIV, and antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis may be offered in accordance with current guidelines.[30,32] Patients should be screened for hepatitis B infection and antiviral prophylaxis initiated if indicated. CD4 count cell must be regularly evaluated during and after chemotherapy, and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis strongly recommended when the CD4 cell count falls below 200 cell/ml for prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia.
CNS prophylaxis. Patients with PBLs HIV are at risk of for leptomeningeal disease. Considering this high risk of progression during the treatment or recurrence during the remission, the use of intrathecal prophylaxis is considered a mandatory part of the systemic treatment.[34] Controlled studies on this field are not available, so the standard procedure has not been defined. However, intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine are administered at each cycle of chemotherapy, based upon institutional preference.[35]
Use of cART during chemotherapy. Most guidelines recommend, on the basis of different meta-analyses, the use of cART during chemotherapy. However, it is important to keep in mind the possible overlapping toxicity, pharmacokinetic interactions, and adherence problems, to avoid stop and start cART strategy because of HIV drug resistance.[10,14] Although no prospective studies have been performed, and controversies abound, the addition of cART to chemotherapy seems to have a favorable effect and gives a benefit both on response and survival.[30,37] A potential explanation for this finding may be that the use of antiretroviral therapy can restore immune surveillance allowing for more efficient anti-cancer effect.[38]

Prognostic Factors

Since the introduction of cART, the prognosis of patients with HIV-associated aggressive lymphoma who receive optimal therapy has markedly improved, and now the outcome is near the same of the HIV-negative counterpart. In general, CD4+ cell counts >200 cells/mm³ and low IPI scores are independent positive prognostic factors.[10,14] In patients on effective cART (i.e. undetectable viral load, high CD4, low incidence of comorbidities), HIV-related scores are less important prognostic factors than lymphoma related features (i.e. histology, tumor burden, LDH, performance status).[20] The prognosis of HIV-associated PBL remains poor. In the recent literature, the median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) ranged between 6-7 months and 11-13 months respectively, without statistical difference between patients treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens and more intensive therapy.[15] However, recently a trend for higher response rates and longer OS have been reported with cases of long-term survivors reported in the literature.[9,39] Several factors affecting outcome are reported in the literature; however, the most important are achieving complete remission, performance status, clinical stage, MYC gene rearrangements, and aaIPI.[39] Furthermore, extended and destructive masses at diagnosis and comorbidities might confer an adverse prognosis.
Differences between HIV-positive and negative PBLs. While data on HIV-negative PBLs patients are sparse, several differences have been identified.[4,5]  HIV-negative PBL occurs in older patients and affects relatively more females. HIV-negative PBL is much more heterogeneous in terms of stage at time of diagnosis with extra-oral involvement being reported at a higher frequency.[9] Immunosuppression is the major risk factor for development of HIV-negative PBL, with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease comprising nearly half of the reported cases. In a literature review, HIV-negative PBL showed to have worse outcome than patients with HIV-positive PBL with a median OS of nine months; CR after induction chemotherapy being the only prognostic factor associated with improved outcomes.[40]
Pediatric cases. Although the majority of patients are adults, PBL has also been reported in pediatric HIV-infected patients.[4,5] A literature review identified only 17 cases. The median age was ten years (range 2-17), >80% with advanced stage at presentation and jaw/oral cavity as the most common site of initial disease.[41] However, extranodal locations (e.g. skin, vulva, spine, scalp) have also been reported. Prognosis is, usually, poor with two reported long-term survivors (3.5 and eight years).[41,42]

Conclusions

HIV-associated PBL is an aggressive and rare subtype of NHL with an aggressive clinical course and poor outcomes. The current knowledge on this rare lymphoma is described in this review and summarized for rapid consultation in Table 1. Finally, the evidence supporting all the strategies reported here arises from single-center series and reviews and not from prospective randomized trials. Hence, due to the scarcity of data on this subtype of NHL and until more definitive evidence become available, the diagnosis and management of HIV-positive PBL patients should be performed in specialized centers. 

Table 1. Key Points on HIV-associated Plasmablastic lymphoma.

Author Contributions

M.B. and J.J.C. equally contributed to the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the article.

 
References

1. Stein H. & Dallenbach F. in Neoplastic Hematopathology (ed.Knowles, D.M.) 675-714 (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MA, 1992).  
   
2. Delecluse HJ, Anagnostopoulos I, Dallenbach F, et al. Plasmablastic lymphomas of the oral cavity: a new entity associated with the human immunodeficiency virus infection. Blood. 1997;89:1413-1420. PMid:9028965   
3. Stein H, Harris N, Campo E. Plasmablastic lymphoma. In: Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris N, et al., editors. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4^th ed. Lyon, France: IARC; 2008. P256-257.  
   
4. Castillo JJ, Winer ES, Stachurski D, et al. HIV-negative plasmablastic lymphoma: not in the mounth. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011;11:185-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2011.03.008 PMid:21575922     
5. Morscio J, Dierickx D, Verhoef G. et al. Clinopathologic comparison of Plasmablastic lymphoma in HIV-positive, immunocompetent, and posttransplant patients: Single-center series of 25 Cases and Meta-analysis of 277 reported cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2014.Jul;38(7):875-86     
6. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection, United States 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 2014;63:Vol 3. April 11 2014 :1-10. 
   
7. Robbins HA, Shiels MS, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Epidemiologic contribution to recent cancer trends among HIV-infected people in the United States. AIDS 2014, 28:881-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000163 PMid:24300545         
8. Gopal S, Patel MR, Yanik EL, et al. Temporal Trends in Presentation and Survival for HIV-Associated lymphoma in the Antiretroviral Therapy Era. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013;105:1221-1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt158 PMid:23892362 PMCid:PMC3748003    
   
9. Al-Malki MM, Castillo JJ, Sloan JM, et al. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Plasmablastic Lymphoma: A Review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jun 16. pii: S1083-8791.  PMid:24946718         
10. Carbone A, Vaccher E, Gloghini A, et al. Diagnosis and management of lymphomas and other cancers in HIV-infected patients. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr;11(4):223-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.31  PMid:24614140     
11. Montes-Moreno S, Gonzalez-Medina AR, Rodriguez-Pinilla SM,et al. Aggressive large B-cell lymphoma with plasma cell differentiation: immunohistochemical characterization of plasmablastic lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with partial plasmablastic phenotype. Haematologica. 2010 Aug;95(8):1342-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2009.016113 PMid:20418245 PMCid:PMC2913083  
    
12. Bibas M, Antinori A. EBV and HIV-Related Lymphoma. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 29;1(2):e2009032. PMid:21416008 PMCid:PMC3033170 
    
13. Boy SC, van Heerden MB, Babb C, et al. Dominant genetic aberrations and coexistent EBV infection in HIV-related oral plasmablastic lymphomas. Oral Oncology 2011 (47) 883-887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.06.506 PMid:21783402       
14. Little RF, Dunleavy K. Update on the treatment of HIV-associated hematologic malignancies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:382- http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.382 PMid:24319208       
15. Castillo JJ, Furman M, Beltrán BE, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated plasmablastic lymphoma: poor prognosis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;118(21):5270-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27551  PMid:22510767       
16. Shaffer AL, Young RM and Staudt LM. Pathogenesis oh Human B Cell lymphomas. Annu Rev Immunolo 2012. 30:565-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075027  PMid:22224767       
17. Gloghini A, Dolcetti R, Carbone A. Lymphomas occurring specifically in HIV-infected patients: from pathogenesis to pathology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013 Dec;23(6):457-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.08.004 PMid:23999127       
18. Bogusz A.M, Seegmiller AC, Garcia R, et al. Plasmablastic lymphomas with MYC/IgH rearrangement:report of three cases and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;132:597-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPFUR1BK0UODTS PMid:19762538       
19. Cattaneo C, Re A, Ungari M, et al. Plasmablastic lymphoma among human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: results of a single center's experience. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Jun 16:1-3. [Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2014.911867 PMid:24712980       
20. Castillo J, Pantanowitz L, Dezube BJ. HIV-associated plasmablastic lymphoma: lessons learned from 112 published cases. Am J Hematol. 2008 Oct;83(10):804-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21250 PMid:18756521       
21. Miyagishima T, Tateno T, Kasahara KH, et al. Successful treatment of an HIV-positive multiple myeloma patient with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2013 Jul;54(7):664-9.PMid:23912351       
22. Muzaffar J, Usmani S, Abdallah AO, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in HIV-positive patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: the myeloma institute of research and therapy experience. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Apr;13(2):171-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2012.12.004 PMid:23313066       
23. Agrawal S, Deshpande A. A unique presentation of multiple myeloma in an HIV patient. Indian J Med Res. 2013 Apr;137(4):815-6. PMid:23703355 PMCid:PMC3724269 
    
24. Coker WJ, Jeter A, Schade H Plasma cell disorders in HIV-infected patients: epidemiology and molecular mechanisms. Biomark Res. 2013 Feb 4;1(1):8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7771-1-8  PMid:24252328 PMCid:PMC4177611  
    
25. Levine AM. Monoclonal gammopathy associated with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 1;43(9):1206-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/508358  PMid:17029143       
26. Sathekge M, Maes A, Van de Wiele C. FDG-PET imaging in HIV infection and tuberculosis. Semin Nucl Med. 2013 Sep;43(5):349-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.04.008 PMid:23905617       
27. Mhlanga JC, Durand D, Tsai HL, et al. Differentiation of HIV-associated lymphoma from HIV-associated reactive adenopathy using quantitative FDG PET and symmetry. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Apr;41(4):596-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2671-9 PMid:24469258       
28. Peccatori FA1, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi160-70. PMid:23813932       
29. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines in Oncology NHL version 2.2014: available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nhl.pdf  Accessed on July 18, 2014.
    
30. Dunleavy K, Wilson WH. How I treat HIV-associated Lymphoma. Blood. 2012 Apr 5;119(14):3245-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-373738 PMid:22337719      PMCid:PMC3321851  
    
31. Re A, Cattaneo C, Skert C, et al. Stem cell mobilization in Hiv sieropositive patients with lymphoma. Haematologica 2013.98(11) 1762-1768. 
    
32. Bibas M, Grisetti S, Alba L, et al. Patient with HIV-associated plasmablastic lymphoma responding to bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, cytarabine, and pegfilgrastim chemotherapy and lenalidomide alone. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 1;28(34):e704-e708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0038 PMid:20823416       
33. Wiernik PH, Lossos IS, Tuscano JM, et al.(2008) Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 26:4952–4957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3429  PMid:18606983       
34. Bilgrami M, O'Keefe P. Neurologic diseases in HIV-infected patients. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;121:1321-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-4088-7.00090-0 PMid:24365422       
35. Spina M, Chimienti E, Martellotta F, et al. Phase 2 study of intrathecal, long-acting liposomal cytarabine in the prophylaxis of lymphomatous meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2010 Mar 15;116(6):1495-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24922  PMid:20108270       
36. Rudek MA, Flexner C, Ambinder RF. Use of antineoplastic agents in patients with cancer who have HIV/AIDS. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):905-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70056-0    
37. Guan B, Zhang X, Ma H, et al. A meta-analysis of highly active anti-retroviral therapy for treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2010;3(1):7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1658-3876(10)50050-5     
38. Rubinstein PG, Aboufalia DM, Zloza A. Malignancies in HIV/AIDS: from epidemiology to therapeutic challenges. AIDS 2014, 28:453-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000071  PMid:24401642      
39. Barta SK, XUE X, Wang D, et al. Treatment factors oucomes in HIV-associated non-Hodgkin lymphomas: a pooled analysis of 1546 patients. Blood 2013;122(19):3251-3262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-04-498964 PMid:24014242       
40. Castillo JJ, Winer ES, Stachurski D, et al. Clinical and pathological differences between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients with plasmablastic lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010 Nov;51(11):2047-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2010.516040 PMid:20919850       
41. Vaubell JI, Sing Y, Ramburan A, et al. Pediatric Plasmablastic Lymphoma: A Clinicopathologic Study. Int J Surg Pathol. 2014 Apr 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066896914531815 PMid:24771257       
42.  Pather S, MacKinnon D, Padayachee RS. Plasmablastic lymphoma in pediatric patients: clinopathologic study of three cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013 Feb;17(1):80-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.08.005 PMid:23036261       

[TOP]