Role of Biomarkers as Predictors of Infection and Death in Neutropenic Febrile Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Karin Massaro1 and Silvia Figueiredo Costa1,2

1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2 Laboratory of Bacteriology-LIM54, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Corresponding author: Silvia F Costa, MD, PhD. Mailing Address: Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 470 – Sao Paulo, 054030¬-000, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Tel. +55 11 3061-7030. E-mail: costasilviaf@ig.com.br  

Published: October 15, 2015
Received: June 18, 2015
Accepted: October 2, 2015
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2015, 7(1): e2015059, DOI 10.4084/MJHID.2015.059
This article is available on PDF format at:

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

An ideal marker in the neutropenic population after HSCT is the one which positivetes at the onset of fever, or at most up to 24 hours after its onset, the patients at potential risk for infection due to bacterial and fungi and mortality. Several biomarkers have been used in HSCT patients in the last decade. However, it seems that C-RP and Il-6 are the most useful markers to early detected infection and risk for death.

Introduction

The number of hematopoietic stem cell transplantations has increased significantly over the past decade. The morbidity and mortality due to infectious complications are the major clinical issue in HSCT recipients.[1,2] However, the identification of these infectious complications is still based on clinical criteria, though, mainly in the occurrence of fever.
In patients after HSCT, it's hard to set infection apart from other causes of fever, such as acute Graft versus host diseases (GVHD), or veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and sinusoidal occlusion syndrome.[3] The detection of these major transplantation-related complications is essential for the early and proper introduction of antibiotics, immunomodulators or hemostatic treatment. The diagnosis and the evolution of infectious complications may be optimized with the help of early sensitive and specific markers of bacterial and fungal infections. An ideal marker should preferably either precede significant microbiological findings or justify an additional intensive search for an infection focus even in afebrile.[4] The early prediction of serious bacteremia helps to identify those patients who are more likely to benefit from a combination of drugs and reduce the unnecessary toxicity of additional treatments when there is no need. At the same time, it helps the identification of patients at low risk of complications, which may be treated at outpatient units.[5,6]

Main Biomarkers

IL-6. Interleukin-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by several types of cells, including monocytes, macrophages and endothelial cells. The main form of IL-6 in human plasma consists of a biologically active 45 kDa molecule.[7]
Interleukin-6 (also called hepatocyte stimulating factor), as previously mentioned, is involved with the production of proteins of the acute phase, such as C-reactive protein (CRP).[8] The production and secretion of IL-6 may be induced by a great variety of stimuli, including infection by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, viruses, lipopolysaccharides, TNF-α, interleukin 1β, gamma interferon and platelet-derived growth factor.[9-11]The kinetics of this cytokine is very fast (induction in less than 1-2 hours), but concentrations may decline within very short time.
IL-6 does not react specifically to an infectious stimulus (it increases both in viral infections and bacterial ones, and in other situations, such as autoimmune disease and tissue trauma) and presents considerable fluctuations in daily levels, suggesting temporary activation or suppression of the immune reaction.[12]
C-reactive protein. The CRP is an acute phase protein, whose serum concentration is remarkably increased right after the occurrence of aggression to the body. Its plasma concentrations are usually below 10 mg/L.[13] It is formed by a complex constituted by five polypeptide subunits synthesized by the liver, not covalently bonded, with an approximate molecular weight between 115 kDa and 140 kDa.
The main stimulus mediator to the production of CRP is IL-6; however, other cytokines, such as IL-1 and TNF-α are also involved in the process.[14-15] Since IL-6 is the main response mediator of the acute phase, many clinical conditions, besides inflammation, may cause a rise in the CRP. Additionally, CRP has the disadvantage of not raising above its reference top level, prior to 8-12 hours after the onset of the inflammatory process.[16]
Procalcitonin. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a 14 kDa protein, coded by gene Calc-1, together with calcitonin and katacalcin (KC). It consists of 114 to 116 amino acids. It is usually found in the C cells of the thyroid, as a pre-hormone of calcitonin. However, in 1993, it was found that serious bacterial infections caused a dramatic release of PCT in the extracellular space. The concentrations of the soluble protein in the serum or plasma, in the normal population, are usually below 0.1 ng/mL (normal range). In case of levels above 0.5 ng/mL, the diagnosis of sepsis must be considered.[17] In a study in which we provided dosages of PCT and CRP in 52 inpatients, with hemopathies and febrile neutropenia, the PCT average was significantly higher in cases with serious infection (6.7 ng/mL versus 0.6 ng/mL).[18] By using a cut-off value of PCT, above 0.245 ng/mL, we observed a 100% of sensitivity and 69.2% of specificity in serious infection, suggesting the use of PCT as a diagnostic marker for severe systemic infection in this population, to the detriment of CRP. This cut-off value was lower than that of the study by Giamarellou et al. (0.5 ng/mL) in 2004.[19]
The pharmacokinetic properties of PCT enable its early use (within six hours), as well as its follow-up (from 24 hours on) as infection and inflammation marker. Another interesting characteristic of this molecule is that its half-life is independent of the renal function.[20]
IL-8. IL-8 is known as a pro-inflammatory cytokine, which is involved in local and systemic inflammatory reactions. Short and high peaks were observed a few days after VOD.[21] IL-8 can be released by endothelial cells activated in response to TNF-α and it is a potent activator of neutrophils, which may contribute to tissue damage.[22]

Studies of Biomarkers of Infection in Febrile Neutropenia after HSCT

PCT, IL-6 and CRP cannot be utilized to differentiate Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) from infection, in patients who receive ATG or similar within up to three days after the application of the drug. PCT, CRP and IL-6 have limited value in the diagnosis of infection during the administration of ATG or other anti T-cell antibodies, such as OKT-3.[23] On the other hand, Blijlevens et al. (2000)[24] found increased levels of PCT in isolated cases of GVHD.
Procalcitonin. There can be a slight induction of PCT after HSCT, as when it occurs in chemotherapy, with levels rarely above 0.5 to 1 ng/mL. That was observed, for instance, in children with ALL, AML, NHL with B and LH cells.[25] In cases of serious infections or sepsis, these patients may also induce high levels of PCT. If neutropenia is severe, the induction of PCT is reduced; however, the synthesis is not totally suppressed.[26-27] Some considerations must be made to justify the different results in two of the studies mentioned. In the study by Blijlevens et al. (2000),[24] the limited number of patients harmed the statistical analysis of the results. Zintl et al. (1996)[28] showed, in a study with patients submitted to HSCT with prior myeloablative chemotherapy, that PCT increases in systemic bacterial infections and is strictly related to the septic shock and also that higher levels indicate bad prognosis. A study that evaluated PCT in neutropenic hematological patients with mucositis revealed that it represents an important tool to predict the occurrence of major infections in patients with febrile neutropenia, even in the presence of associated complicating conditions, such as mucositis and GVHD.[29] A lower threshold value (e.g. PCT > 0.25 ng/mL) increases the diagnostic reliability in case of a serious infection, even in patients with neutropenia.[30-31] This reduced increase may happen since the adhering monocytes, among other factors, are necessary for the induction of PCT. Even if the immune response is overall weakened in neutropenic patients, and also by the use of corticosteroids or cyclosporine for the treatment of autoimmune diseases or after transplantation, the induction of PCT is not totally suppressed.[32] In case of neutropenia, the severity of the systemic inflammatory response cannot often be evaluated, since the “fever” symptom is weakly associated with the gravity of the sepsis or prognosis of the disease. In an international multicentric study, 158 patients with neutropenia and fever were evaluated.[19] A cut-off value of 5 ng/mL determined a sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of severe sepsis of 83% and 100% respectively. In concentrations below 0.5 ng/mL, the severe infection would be unlikely. In case of fungal infections, the levels of PCT were 1.17 ± 0.44 ng/mL on the first day of diagnosis, with a quick downward trend. Twelve patients died. On the first day of fever, they had levels of PCT of 20.45 ± 4.48 ng/mL (average, standard deviation). Similar data were reported in other studies. [24,26,33] A study that compared the value of PCT, neopterin, CRP, IL-6 and IL-8, as diagnostic markers for such purpose, showed an area under the ROC curve in the distinction of bacteremia by Gram-negative from all the other causes of fever of 0.863 (IC 95% 0.74-0.98) and results not significant for the other markers.[34]
Ortega et al. (2004)[35] showed PCT levels in patients after HSCT with FUO of 0.3 ± 0.2 ng/mL (average, standard deviation), and with infections microbiologically documented in the range of 0.5 ± 0.7 ng/mL. In cases of extended fever (over five days) and on suspicion of aspergillosis, the levels of PCT were even higher (10.1 ± 6.7 ng/mL).
In a recent study that evaluated the relevance of ultrasensitive CRP and PCT levels in patients after HSCT, it was verified that the ultrasensitive CRP was higher in the patients with aGVHD and also in the cases of sepsis. The increased levels of PCT were associated only with a bacterial infection. Only the levels of PCT could be used to differentiate infection from other complications related to transplantation.[36] In the study mentioned, PCT, besides not increasing in GVHD, did not increase in fungal infections, although the bias of that study was the size of the sample (n = 35).
C-reactive protein. A study with adult patients submitted to allogeneic HSCT (n = 137) showed that the pre transplantation CRP and serum ferritin levels can be predictors of bacterial complications.[37] This study has the limitations of being retrospective, without standardization of different hematological diseases and limited number of samples. Likewise, Pihusch et al. (2006)[38] found high CRP levels both in infections after HSCT and in aGVHD cases. In this study, which analyzed the levels of PCT, CRP, and IL-6, prospectively, in 350 patients after HSCT, conditioning of some patients included anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). It is well known that ATG, which is a pool of heterologous antibodies against T-cells of direct form (opsonization and lysis via complement activation), causes early increase of TNF-α, CRP, IL-6 and PCT (few minutes after administration).[23,39]    
Interleukin-6 (IL-6). Some studies show that IL-6 is a sensitive marker for acute infections in febrile neutropenia and it can be used as a marker of unfavorable results in this situation.[40-42]
The values of IL-6 (measured by the Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] method) for febrile neutropenia vary in several studies. In the study by Steinmetz et al. (1995),[8] the level of detection threshold was of 3 pg/mL, with intratest variations of < 15% (in the 3-100 pg/mL range) and < 20% for values > 100 pg/mL. A significant increase of IL-6 was considered as an increase higher than 20 pg/mL or 30% for levels < 100 pg/mL and ≥50 pg/mL or 20% for levels > 100 pg/mL. A cut-off value of IL-6 of 297 pg/mL presented sensitiveness of 62%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70% (p = 0.016) for the identification of infection in neutropenic patients.[33]
Interleukin-8 (IL-8). The rapid increase of IL-6 and IL-8, quickly detectable on the first days after the HSCT, may either be the mere reflection of the severity of the inflammatory response or it may indicate the deleterious synergic effect of these cytokines on tissues. In the study by Schots,[22] the multivariate analysis showed that the increase of these cytokines, especially IL-8, was associated with a fatal result in HSCT. There is also a study that relates IL-8 to the adult respiratory distress syndrome.[43]
The study by Prat et al. evaluated several biomarkers (PCT, CRP, neopterin, IL-6 and IL-8) in 61 adults (with 41 submitted to HSCT, and the other ones only under chemotherapy). IL-6 and IL-8 did not prove useful to prevent bloodstream infection before chemotherapy, on the first day of neutropenia nor subsequent days.[34]

Table 1
 Table 1. The most important studies with adult patients submitted to HSCT comparing use of biomarkers to predict infections.


Studies of Inflammation Marker and Poor Prognosis (Death) Related to HSCT

An ideal death marker in the neutropenic population after HSCT is the one that indicates, at the onset of fever, or at most up to 24 hours after, the patients under potential risk of death transplant-related. There are few studies in literature to help the prediction of the prognosis of patients submitted to HSCT and the existing studies evaluate a small number of subjects. The following table shows the main studies that evaluated death predictors after HSCT (Table 2). The studies published about the prognosis in patients after HSCT are divided into allogeneic or autologous. Despite the advance in supporting treatment, the allogeneic HSCT still presents high toxicity, with mortality related to transplantation between 10-50% due to major complications during the first months after transplantation (infections, VOD, GVHD and pneumonitis). 

Table2
 Table 2. The most important studies with adult patients submitted to HSCT comparing the use of biomarkers as predictors of death. 

In a prospective study of 296 patients submitted to HSCT at our university hospital, IL-6, PCT and CRP were evaluated on the day of confirmed neutropenia, on the day of the febrile event, 24 and 72 hours after its onset, and 48 hours or 5 days, in case the fever, persisted.[44] The patients were evaluated after the discharge or death within 30 days from the HSCT. Only CRP ≥120 mg/L was independently associated with death. The other risk factors associated with death in the multivariate analysis were: type of transplantation (allogeneic and unrelated), bloodstream infection by Gram-negative, LDH≥390 IU/L and urea ≥25 mg/dL. For allogeneic patients, only CRP≥120mg/L and bloodstream infection by Gram- negative were risk factors for death. No independent risk factor was evidenced for the subgroup of autologous patients. We could not demonstrate the association between IL-6 and PCT and death. Other authors demonstrated similar results, however, in studies with a smaller number of cases and or without multivariate analyzes or testing only one or two biomarkers.[21,22,35,37] Artz et al.[42] utilized multivariate analysis, however, with a smaller number of patients (n = 112) and only analyzed two markers (CRP and IL-6) in allogeneic HSCT. In their study, the median of CRP was 18 mg/L, and of IL-6 was 78 pg/mL, showing that high levels of CRP, but not of IL-6, before the conditioning for HSCT, were independent predictors of death related to allogeneic transplantation. The study of Remberger et al. (2010),[21] despite including a large number patients, 299, was retrospective, without multivariate analysis and, likewise the two previous ones, evaluated only CRP in allogeneic HSCT before the conditioning. The authors showed that mortality related to transplantation was lower in patients with non-myeloablative regimens with high CRP (67 vs 43%, p = 0.005, and 16 vs 30%, p = 0.036). Finally, the study by Ortega et al. (2004)[35] analyzed only CRP, did not utilize multivariate analysis and the number of 100 (smaller than that of the present study), in autologous and allogeneic patients, and showed that CRP on the 5th day of fever ≥ 16 mg/dL was associated with death, due to infectious causes with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 87%, PPV and NPV of 30 and 100%, respectively.
Schots et al. (2002)[22] monitored the levels of CRP and other variables in 96 consecutive adults submitted to allogeneic HSCT, dosing from day 0 to +5. Only the high levels of CRP (> 50 mg/L) (p < 0.001) and type of allogeneic donor (p = 0.02) were the independent factors for mortality related to transplantation. The retrospective study of Remberger et al. (2010)[21], evaluated the clinical impact of CRP in allogeneic HSCT patients, before the conditioning (n = 205) and after the not-myeloablative and myeloablative conditioning regimens (n = 299). There was a significant correlation between CRP levels in both groups with overall survival and mortality related to transplantation increased in individuals who had received non-myeloablative conditioning. Early death by infection (within 100 days) resulted in 25 and 8.7% of patients with high CRP with and without documented infection, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04), compared to patients with normal CRP, where early death by infection occurred in 2.3% of patients. Remberger et al. (2010)[21] concluded that CRP may be utilized as a prognostic factor because it enables the identification of infection in earlier stages, as also observed in our results. In the studies by Pihusch et al., the serum levels of CRP (5.2 mg/dL vs 7.8 mg/dL, p < 0.001), IL-6 (147 ng/mL vs 494 ng/mL; p < 0.001) and PCT (2.1 ng/mL vs 4.0 ng/mL; p = 0.003) were high until week +2 in the group of patients who died of complications related to transplantation, compared to the group that survived.

Perspectives

The treatment of febrile neutropenic patients after HSCT requires proper and early diagnosis. Thus, biomarkers can be very useful to control the antibiotic use in this setting. Sensitive and specific lab markers in differentiating the infectious and non-infectious origin of the fever may help the proper use of antibiotics, thus leading to cost reduction. Until now, however, the role of biomarkers as tools in the conduction of the febrile neutropenia is questionable. The latest guide from the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) does not recommend the use of those biomarkers.[45] Therapeutic decisions are still based on the combination of anamnesis, physical examination and microbiological tests. An ideal marker is the one that can be easily obtained from clinical specimens, before the development of severe sepsis. It should not be influenced by cytopenias or inflammatory states associated with the underlying disease.
Besides, it is always hard to correlate laboratory findings and clinical events, mainly in such peculiar population. An ideal marker should be easily detected in blood samples obtained before the development of more severe sepsis and should not be influenced by cytopenias, drugs, or by the inflammatory reaction to the underlying disease. IL-8 is also a marker studied quite often but does not have these characteristics.

References

  1. Ochs L, Shu XO, Miller J, Enright H, Wagner J, Filipovich A. Late infections after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: comparison of incidence in related and unrelated donor transplant recipients. Blood. 1995; 86: 3979-86.     
  2. Sorely JS, Shea TC. Prevention of infections in bone marrow transplant recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997; 11:459-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70365-2      
  3. Südhoff T, Giagounidis A, Karthaus M. Evaluation of neutropenic fever: value of serum and plasma parameters in clinical practice. Chemotherapy. 2000; 46: 77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000007259      
  4. Belesso M, Costa SF, Chamone DAF, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE. Triagem para o tratamento ambulatorial da neutropenia febril. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2010; 32(5):402-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-84842010000500014      
  5. Kern WV. Risk assessment and treatment of low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42:533-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499352      
  6. Matsuda T, Hirano T, Nagasawa S. Identification of alpha2-macroglobulin as a carrier protein for IL-6. J Immunol. 1989; 142:148-52.     
  7. Steinmetz HT, Herbertz A, Bertram M, Diehl V. Increase in interleukin-6 serum level preceding fever in granulocytopenia and correlation with death from sepsis. J Infect Dis. 1995; 171(1):225-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/171.1.225  PMid:7798669         
  8. Lowry SF, Moldawer LL. Cytokines and cytokines antagonists in sepsis and critical illness. In: Vincent JL (ed). Yearbook on intensive care and emergency medicine. Berlin, Springler Verlag, 1992, pp 36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84734-9_4      
  9. Johnson K, Choi Y, De Groot E. Potential mechanisms for a proinflammatory vascular cytokine response to coagulation activation. J Immunol. 1998; 160:5130-5     .
  10. Van Snick J. Interleukin-6: An overview. Ann Rev Immunol. 1990; 8: 253-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.001345      
  11. Oberhoffer M, Karzai W, Meier-Hellmann A, Bogel D, Fabetabinder J, Reinhart K. Sensitivity and specitivity of various markers of inflammation for the prediction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in patients with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(9):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199909000-00018      
  12. Pepys MB, Baltz ML. Acute phase proteins with special reference to C-reactive protein and related proteins (pentraxins) and serum amyloid A protein. Adv Immunol. 1983; 34:141-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60379-X      
  13. Sim JE, March CD, Cosman D. cDNA expression cloning of the IL-1 receptor, a member of the immunoglobulin super-family. Science. 1988; 241:585-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2969618      
  14. Castell JV, Gomes-Lechon MJ, David M. Hepatology 1990; Acute phase response of human hepatocytes: regulation of acute-phase protein synthesis by inteleukin-6. Hepatology. 1990; 12:1179-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840120517 PMid:1699862         
  15. Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Palmers T. Procalcitonin and CRP in septic shock: Inflammatory parameters with different kinetics. Abstr. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22:14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01921188      
  16. Meisner M. Procalcitonin- biochemistry and clinical diagnosis. Bremen: UNI-MED Verlag AG, 2010.     
  17. Massaro KS, Costa SF, Leone C, Chamone DA. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as severe systemic infection markers in febrile neutropenic adults.BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 22;7:137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-7-137  PMCid:PMC2217552     
  18. Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Repoussis P, Galani L, Anagnostopoulos N, Grecka P. Potential use of procalcitonin as a diagnostic criterion in febrile neutropenia: experience from a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10:628-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00883.x PMid:15214875         
  19. Meisner M, Schmidt J, Huttner H, Tschaikowsky K. The natural elimination rate of procalcitonin in patients with normal and impaired renal function. Intensive care Med. 2000; 26(Suppl. 2):S212-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001340051146      
  20. Remberger M, Ringden O. Serum levels of cytokines after bone marrow transplantation: increased IL-8 levels during severe veno-occlusive disease of the liver. Eur J Haematol 1997; 59:254-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.1997.tb00985.x PMid:9338624        
  21. Schots R, Kaufman L, Van Riet I, Lacor P, Trullemans F, De Waele M, Van, Camp B. Monitoring of C-reactive protein after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation identifies patients at risk of severe transplant-related complications and mortality. Bone Marrow Transplantation 1998; 22:79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701286 PMid:9678800         
  22. Brodska H, Drabek T, Malickova K, Kazda A, Vitek A, Zima T, Markova M. Marked increase of procalcitonin after the administration of anti-thymocyte globulin in patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation does not indicate sepsis: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2008; 13(2):1-7.     
  23. Blijlevens NMA, Donnelly JP, Meis FGM, De Keizer MH, De Pauw BE. Procalcitonin does not discriminate infection from inflammation after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000; 7(6):889-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cdli.7.6.889-892.2000      
  24. Fleischhack G, Kambeck I, Cipic D, Hasan C, Bode U. Procalcitonin in paediatric cancer patients: its diagnostic relevance is superior to that of C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, interleukin 8, soluble interleukin 2 receptor and soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor II. Br J Haematol. 2000; 111(4):1093-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02458.x PMid:11167745         
  25. Hambach L, Eder M, Dammann E, Schrauder A, Sykora KW, Dieterich C. Diagnosis value of procalcitonin serum levels in comparison with C-reactive protein in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2002; 87:643-51. PMid:12031922         
  26. Sauer M, Tiede K, Fuchs D, Gruhn B, Berger D, Zintl F. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and endotoxin after bone marrow transplantation: identification of children at high risk of morbidity and mortality from sepsis. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2003; 31:1137-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704045 PMid:12796793         
  27. Zintl F, Sauer M, Fuchs D, Hermann J, Reinhart K. High serum procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations in children and adults after hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) - An indicator for poor prognosis in severe infections. Blood. 1996; 88 (suppl. 1):266.     
  28. Sarmati L, Beltrame A, Dori L, Maffongelli, Cudillo L, De Angels G, Picardi A, Ottaviani L, Cefalo MG, Venditti A, Amadori S, Arcese W, Andreoni M. Procalcitonin is a reliable marker of severe systemic infection in neutropenic haematological patients with mucositis. Am J Hematol. 2010; 85(5):380-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21685      
  29. Engel A, Steinbach G, Kern P, Kern WV. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin serum levels in neutropenic patients with fever: comparison with IL-8. Scand J Infect Dis. 1999; 31:185-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/003655499750006254      
  30. Schüttrumpf S, Binder L, Hagemann T, Berkovic D, Trümper L, Binder C. Procalcitonin: a useful discriminator between febrile conditions of different origin in hemato-oncological patients? Ann Hematol. 2003; 82:98-103.     
  31. Rinaldi S, Adembri C, Grechi S, De Gaudio R. Low-dose hydrocortisone during severe sepsis: effects on microalbuminuria. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34:2334-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000233872.04706.BB PMid:16850006         
  32. von Lilienfeld-Toal M, Dietrich MP, Glasmacher A, Lehmann L, Breig P, Hahn C. Markers of bacteremia in febrile neutropenia patients with hematologic malignancies: procalcitonin and IL-6 are more reliable than CRP. J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004; 23:539-44.     
  33. Prat C, Sancho JM, Dominguez J, Xicoy B, Gimenez M, Ferra C. Evaluation of procalcitonin, neopterin, C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-8 as a diagnostic marker of infection in patients with febrile neutropenia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008; 49:1752-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428190802258956      
  34. Ortega M, Rovira M, Filella X, Almela M, de la Bellacasa JP, Carreras E. Prospective evaluation of procalcitonin in adults with febrile neutropenia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Brit J Hematology. 2004; 126:372-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05053.x      
  35. Azarpira N, Ramzi M, Aghdaie M, Daraie M. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein serum levels after hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Exp Clin Transplant. 2009; 2:115-8.     
  36. Kanda J, Mizumoto C, Ichinohe T, Kawabata H, Saito T, Yamashita K, Kondo T, Takakura S, Ichiyama S, Uchiyama T, Ishikawa T. Pretransplant serum ferritin and C- reative protein as predictive factors for early bacterial infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010; 3:1-9.     
  37. Pihusch M, Pihusch R, Fraunberger P. Evaluation of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin levels in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Eur J Haematol. 2006; 76(2):93-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0902-4441.2005.00568.x      
  38. Dornbusch HJ, Strenger V, Kerl R, Lackner H, Schwinger W, Sovinz P, Urban C. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein do not discriminate between febrile reaction to anti-T- lymphocyte antibodies and Gram-negative sepsis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 32:941-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704265 PMid:14561996         
  39. Tegg EM, Griffiths AE, Lowenthal RM, Tuck DM, Harrup R, Marsden KA, Jupe DML, Ragg S, Matthews JP. Association between high interleukin-6 levels and adverse outcome after autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2001; 28:929-933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703272 PMid:11753546         
  40. Erten N, Genc S, Besisik SK, Saka B, Karan MA, Tascioglu C. The predictive and diagnostic values of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for clinical outcome in febrile neutropenic patients. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004; 67:217-21. PMid:15357107         
  41. Artz AS, Wickrema A, Dinner S, Godley LA, Kocherginsky M, Odenike O, Rich ES, Stock W, Ulaszek J, Larson RA, van Besien K. Pretreatment C-Reactive protein is a predictor for outcomes after reduced-intensity allogeneicHematopoietic cell transplantation. Boil Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008; 14:1209-1216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.08.004 PMid:18940674         
  42. Donnelly SC, Strieter RM, Kunkel SL, Walz A, Robertson CR, Carter DC. Interleukin-8 and development of adult respiratory distress syndrome in at-risk patients groups. Lancet 1993;341:643-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)90416-E      
  43. Zahid MF, Ali N, Shaikh MU, Adil SN. Outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2014;8(4):30-8. PMid:25774265         
  44. Massaro KS, Macedo R, de Castro BS, Dulley F, Oliveira MS, Yasuda MA, Levin AS, Costa SF. Risk factor for death in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: are biomarkers useful to foresee the prognosis in this population of patients? Infection. 2014;42(6):1023-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-014-0685-2 PMid:25263811         
  45. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young J-A H, Wingard JR. Clinical Practice Guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. CID. 2011: 52(4):e56-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir073 PMid:21258094     

[TOP]