Rapanotti
M.C.1, Franceschini L.2,
Suarez Viguria T.M.1, Ialongo C.1,
Fraboni D.1, Cerretti R.3,
De Angelis G.3, Pupo L.2,
Rizzo M., Cantonetti M.2, Postorino M.2,
Voso M.T.1,2, Lo-Coco F.1,2
1
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Rome “University of
Rome “Tor Vergata.”
2 Department of Biomedicine and Prevention,
University of Rome “University of Rome “Tor Vergata.”
3 Stem Cell Transplant Unit for Rome Transplant
Network, University of Rome “University of Rome “Tor Vergata.”
Correspondence to: Maria Cristina Rapanotti. Department of Laboratory
Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”. E-mail:
cristinarapanotti@yahoo.it
Published: November 1,
2018
Received: July 18, 2018
Accepted: September 19, 2018
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2018, 10(1): e2018059 DOI
10.4084/MJHID.2018.059
This is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
|
Multiple
Myeloma (MM) is a malignant B-cell disorder characterized by monoclonal
expansion of plasma cells (PC) within the bone marrow (BM), and the
development of a destructive osteolytic bone disease.[1]
Angiogenesis plays an important role in the pathogenesis and
progression of MM and develops as a multi-step process including
perivascular detachment of existing vessels, matrix-degradation,
migration of endothelial cells (EC) and formation of a functional
vascular plexus.[2,3]
The extracellular
environment is crucial for the physiological development of the nascent
sprout interaction; cell surface receptors of the integrin family
mediate adhesion to and signaling by the extracellular matrix (ECM).
Indeed, the Integrin Receptor αvβ3 for Von
Willebrand factor (VWF) is expressed on EC and has been shown to play a
crucial role in angiogenesis.[4]
In this line, malignant PC promote vessel formation through
the
expression of angiogenic molecules or their induction in the
microenviroment.[5] Effectively, a
striking feature of
MM is the predominant localization of malignant PC in the bone marrow,
close to stromal cells, where they secrete several angiogenic
activators, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic
fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and HGF hepatocyte growth factor
(HGF). They also activate matrix- metalloproteinase-degrading enzymes
(MMPs) and regulator of the quiescence/angiogenesis
balance such
as angiopoietins (Ang1/Ang2), involved in tumour-induced base membrane
matrix remodeling, endothelial cell (EC) migration, and vessel
formation.[4-8] The progression
from in-situ to
invasive, and to metastatic tumor has been described as a switch from
avascular to vascular phase.[9,10]
In MM, this
transition which finally results in tumor growth has been associated
with the imbalance of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors in the
microenviroment. Active MM may represent the vascular phase, whereas
smoldering myeloma (SM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined
significance (MGUS) may be considered the avascular phase in the spectrum
of PC disorders. Actually, a gradual increase in the angiogenesis rate,
the modulation of specific cell-cell adhesion molecules and secretion
of MMPs play an important role in changing the bone marrow composition
from benign conditions, such as MGUS, to SM and active MM.[10,11]
Based
on these considerations, we analyzed the “angiogenic potential”, and
the gene expression profiles of cell-cell adhesion molecules in the BM
and peripheral blood (PB) PC from patients with MGUS, SM and active MM,
in comparison with healthy subjects. To this purpose, we selected
several pro-angiogenic factors, cell-cell adhesion molecules and
Matrix-Metallo Proteinases, including VEGF, Ang-2, bFGF, MMP-2, MMP-9,
VE-Cadh (vascular endothelial cadherin, CDH5), MCAM/MUC18 (endothelial
antigen CD146) and E-Cadh (epithelial cadherin, CDH1), this last known
to be involved in epithelial cell-cell adhesion processes to analyze
all PC expressing CD138.
Sixty-one patients diagnosed with plasma cell diseases according to the
International Myeloma Working Group guidelines[12]
and 14 healthy donors were enrolled in this prospective study
(median age 55 years). All patients were treated at the Hematology
Department of “Tor Vergata” University of Rome and gave informed
consent before study inclusion, according to the declaration of
Helsinki. They were diagnosed and classified as follows: 13 MGUS, 25
SM, 23 MM, (three of which were extramedullary MM). Healthy controls
included 14 BM donors (4 males and 10 females, mean age 44.6 years) and
30 PB donors (15 males and 15 females, with median age 45 years; range
18-55 years) accessing our Stem Cell Transplantation Unit. Since the
expected frequency of circulating CD138+ cells is about 10-4,
at least 30 ml PB was collected. CD138+ PC were isolated using the
RosetteSep Multiple Myeloma Enrichment Cocktail as described by the
manufacturer (Voden-Stem Cell Technology Inc., Milan, Italy), and
purity of the selected population was assessed in selected cases (n=10)
using immunophenotype. Briefly, after enrichment cells were stained
with predefined optimal concentrations of the specific antibodies
(anti-CD19, anti-CD45, anti-CD38 anti-CD138, anti-CD20 and anti-CD56),
using standard conditions. At least 10000 events were acquired for each
sample, gating for CD138+ cells. Gene expression of the above-mentioned
pro-angiogenic factors, cell-cell adhesion molecules and
Matrix-Metallo- Proteinases was also analyzed in primary cells
(fibroblasts, EDS, endothelial Huvec) and tumor cell lines as positive
and negative controls (Table
1). Total RNA was reverted to cDNA using oligod(T)16-18
as primers. Qualitative RT-PCR for all genes was performed on RNA
isolated from CD138+ cell samples, using the oligonucleotide listed in
the supplementary file and according to the manufacturer’s instructions
(Applied BioSystems, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburh, New
Jersey, USA). All PCR experiments were performed in triplicate using
the housekeeping gene beta2-microglobulin as an internal control. Due
to the small cohort of samples, a 2-step analysis was performed.
Differences between the four groups (MM, SM, MGUS and healthy donors)
were analyzed using multiple pairwise comparisons, by the Marascuilo
procedure that provides the magnitude of variation in the pairs of
proportions and allows to simultaneously test the differences of all
pairs of proportions, when there are several populations under
investigation.
|
Table
1. Analysis of
expression of angiogenic factors, pro-angiogenic factors, cell-cell
adhesion molecules and Matrix-Metallo Proteinases in primary samples
and tumor cell lines. |
In
the second step, a binomial logistic regression
(corrected for age and sex
covariates and with
backward stepwise elimination) was
performed
in order identify the genes whose expression was predictive
of
the transformation from MGUS to SM, and from SM to active MM.[13] Statistical significance was
considered as P<0.01 for Marascuilo procedure, and P<0.05
for logistic regression.
We isolated a median of 2x106
CD138+ PC (range: 1-4 106
cells) from 2 ml BM or PB samples. The purity after enrichment was
>96%, as measured by flow cytometry using a PE- conjugated
anti-CD138 antibody, (Figure
1).
Expression of investigated genes was also performed in primary control
cells and tumor cell lines heterogeneous in primary control cells and
tumor cell lines as summarized in Table
1.
In particular, E-Cadh was expressed in most controls, except the
neuroblastoma cell line (SH-Sy5y) and the two MM lines (Arp1 and U266),
that tested negative. All four melanoma cell lines (M10, M14, FO1 and
Colo38) expressed the endothelial antigen MCAM/MUC18, while the breast
cancer cell lines (MB 231, MCF-7) and the androgen- dependent prostate
cells (LNCap) were negative. Also, myeloma cell lines, (Arp-1, U266),
did not express MCAM/MUC18/CD146, despite the use of a highly sensitive
nested-PCR, as reported.[14]
|
Figure
1. Flow cytometry of a sample of active MM assessed by anti CD 138
enrichment and separation. |
Circulating
CD 138+PC displayed only weak not statistically significant mRNA
expression (bFGF 12 pts, 40%; MMPs 4 pts, 13%; VE-CADH 8 pts, 26.6%;
and VEGF 6 pts, 20%). Expression was constantly absent in the BM of
healthy donors, except weak VE-Cadh and bFGF positivity. Analysis of
BM-PC selected from individual patients showed concomitant expression
of the angiogenic factors VEGF, MUC18/MCAM, and Ang-2, that
characterized early stages of disease (MGUS and SM). On the other hand,
bFGF and MMPs expression was only detectable during disease progression
and active MM. E- Cadh was expressed by the PC of active MM (n=20)
(100% positivity), excluding the three extra-medullary MM (Table 2 part a).
The absence of expression of MMP-9 was predictive of stable MGUS, with
no signs of progression to SM (OR=41.5, p=0.016), and the absence of
E-Cadh expression defined stable SM, with no signs of evolution to
symptomatic MM (OR=15.9. p<0.01). Indeed, MMP-9 expression
improved
classification of 69% of patients with MGUS and 84.6% of those with SM.
Similarly, E-Cadh expression improved the definition of 76.9% of SM and
82.6% of symptomatic MM, including extramedullary multiple myeloma.
Therefore, E- Cadh expression resulted not only suggestive but was
predictive of the transition from SM to MM (OR=15.9 p<0.01),
mostly
in association with MMPs and bFGF expression (Table 2 part b).
|
Table
2. Expression
(%) of angiogenic factors, cell-cell adhesion molecules and
matrix-metallo-proteins in BM CD138+ cells and statistical significance |
Angiogenesis
and massive secretion of matrix- metalloproteinase-degrading enzymes
occur in several solid tumors during invasion and metastasis and play a
key role in the pathogenesis and progression of MM.[3-6]
The results of our study support these data, reflecting the disease
spectrum from MGUS to MM, and indicating an increase of angiogenesis,
cell-cell adhesion and secretion of MMPs in the progression towards
active MM.
This profile is in agreement with the “angiogenic
switch” from the pre-vascular to the vascular phase in solid tumors
proposed by Ribatti et al.[8,9]
To our knowledge,
we report for the first time that E-Cadh expression, the main
epithelial cell- adhesion molecule, was highly predictive of the
transition from SM to symptomatic MM.[15]
Accordingly, loss of E-Cadh-mediated adhesion characterizes the
transition from benign lesions to invasive and metastatic cancer,
associated with epithelial-mesenchymal conversion. In this setting,
E-Cadh may be considered as a tumor suppressor gene, whose loss allows
and enhances the invasion of adjacent normal tissues, increasing the
metastatic potential.[15,16]
Despite this, some reports documented increased serum concentration
of soluble E-Cadh in various forms of epithelial and non-epithelial
malignancies.[17] In keeping with
the findings reported by Wrobel et al. (2006),[18]
that describes high VE-Cadh serum
levels in MM patients at diagnosis, we did not confirm a statistical
significant mRNA overexpression of this cell-cell adhesion
molecule, likely corresponding to this expected serum
increase. We also report the constant association of the endothelial
antigen MCAM/MUC18/CD146 recently correlated with poor prognosis in
malignant melanoma,[14] with the
better known VEGF and Ang2 expression which may indicate vascular tumor
remodeling in MM-PC.[19,20]
In
conclusion, the expression panel described in this report may help to
discriminate between stable MGUS and those evolving towards SM and
might be proposed as an additional tool to identify patients at risk of
progression to MM.
Quantitative RNA and protein expression assays
may further validate the prognostic role of E-cadherin and MCAM in the
context of a prospective study.
References
- Bartl R. Histologic
classification and staging of
multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol.1988; 6 (2):107-113
https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2900060209 PMid:3391529
- Folkman
J, Shing Y Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267(16):10931-10934.
PMid:1375931
- Vacca
A, Ribatti D, Roccaro AM, Ria R, Palermo L, Dammacco F. Bone marrow
angiogenesis and plasma cell angiogenic and invasive potential in
patients with active multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol. 2001;
106(4):162-169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000046612 PMid:11815713
- Randi
AM, Laffan MA, Starke RD. Von Willebrand factor, angiodysplasia and
angiogenesis. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 2;5(1):e2013060.
https://doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2013.060
- Vacca
A, Ribatti D, Roccaro AM, Ria R, Palermo L, Dammacco F. Bone marrow
angiogenesis and plasma cell angiogenic and invasive potential in
patients with active multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol. 2001;
106(4):162-169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000046612 PMid:11815713
- Jakob
C, Sterz J, Zavrski I., Heider U, Kleeberg L, Fleissner C, Kaiser M,
Sezer O. Angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer 2006;
42(11):1581-1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.02.017
PMid:16797965
- Colla
S, Morandi F, Lazzaretti M, Polistena P, Svaldi M, Coser P, Bonomini S,
Hojden M, Martella E, Chisesi T, Rizzoli V, Giuliani N.Do human myeloma
cells directly produce basic FGF? Blood. 2003; 15;102(8):3071-2; author
reply 3072-3.
- Vande
Broek I, Vanderkerken K, Van Camp B, Van Riet I. Extravasation and
homing mechanisms in multiple myeloma. Clin Exp Metastasis.
2008;25(4):325-34. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-007-9108-4 PMid:17952614
- Bergers
G, Benjamin LE. Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev
Cancer. 2003; 6:401-410. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1093 PMid:12778130
- Ribatti
D, Nico B, Crivellato E, Roccaro AM, Vacca A.The history of the
angiogenic switch concept. Leukemia. 2007; 21(1):44-52.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404402 PMid:16990761
- Vacca
A, Ribatti D, Presta M, Minischetti M, Iurlaro M, Ria R, Albini A,
Bussolino F, Dammacco F. Bone marrow neovascularization, plasma cell
angiogenic potential, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 secretion parallel
progression of human multiple myeloma. Blood. 1999; 93(9):3064-3073.
PMid:10216103
- Rajkumar
SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos MV, Kumar S,
Hillengass J, Kastritis E, Richardson P, Landgren O, Paiva B,
Dispenzieri A, Weiss B, LeLeu X, Zweegman S, Lonial S, Rosinol L,
- Zamagni
E, Jagannath S, Sezer O, Kristinsson SY, Caers J, Usmani SZ, Lahuerta
JJ, Johnsen HE, Beksac M, Cavo M, Goldschmidt H, Terpos E, Kyle RA,
Anderson KC, Durie BG, Miguel JF. International Myeloma Working Group
updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol.
2014; 15(12):538-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
- Marascuilo
LA, McSweeney M. Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychol
Bull. 1967; 67(6):401-412. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020421
- Rapanotti
MC, Suarez Viguria TM, Costanza G, Ricozzi I., Pierantozzi A, Di
Stefani A, Campione E., Bernardini S, Chimenti S, Orlandi A, Bianchi L.
(2014) "Sequential molecular analysis of circulating MCAM/MUC18
expression: a disease biomarker related to clinical out come in
melanoma". Arch. Dermatol Res., Aug;306(6):527-537. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-014-1473-7
- van
Roy F, Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol
Life Sci. 2008;65(23):3756-3788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-
008-8281-1
- Pećina-Slaus
N. Cancer Tumor suppressor gene E-cadherin and its role in normal and
malignant cells. Cell Int. 2003; 3(1):17.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2867-3-17 PMid:14613514 PMCid:PMC270068
Syrigos
KN, Harrington KJ, Karayiannakis AJ, Baibas N, Katirtzoglou N, Roussou
P. Circulating soluble E-cadherin levels are of prognostic significance
in patients with multiple myeloma. Anticancer Res. 2004;
24(3):2027-20. PMid:15274395
- Wrobel
T, Mazur G, Wolowiec D, Jazwiec B, Sowinska E, Kuliczkowski K.
sVE-cadherin and sCD146 serum levels in patients with multiple myeloma.
Clin Lab Haematol. 2006; 28(1):36-39.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00756.x PMid:16430458
- Vajkoczy
P, Farhadi M, Gaumann A, Heidenreich R, Erber R, Wunder A, Tonn JC,
Menger MD, Breier G. Microtumor growth initiates angiogenic sprouting
with simultaneous expression of VEGF, VEGF receptor-2, and
angiopoietin-2. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109(6):777-785.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI0214105 PMid:11901186 PMCid:PMC150910
- Joshi
S. Khan R, Sharma M, Kumar L, Sharma A. Angiopoietin-2: a potential
novel diagnostic marker in multiple myeloma. Clin Biochem. 2011;
44(8-9):590-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.01.010
PMid:21300047
[TOP]