THE PERFORMANCE OF 2023 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY (ACR) / EUROPEAN ALLIANCE OF ASSOCIATIONS FOR RHEUMATOLOGY (EULAR) ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA IN A REAL-WORLD RHEUMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
Background: Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is one of the most common acquired causes of hypercoagulability. The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) / European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) APS Classification Criteria were specified as new APS classification criteria with high specificity for use in observational studies and research. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in a real-world rheumatology department.
Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the 2006 revised Sapporo and 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in patients diagnosed with APS by clinical evaluation. A total of 184 patients, 103 of whom were diagnosed with APS, were included in the study.
Results: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria demonstrate higher specificity 98.8% (95% CI 93.3-99.8) and positive predictive value (PPV) 98.7% (95% CI 93.2-99.8), whereas the revised Sapporo criteria exhibit higher sensitivity 90.3% (95% CI 83-96.6), negative predictive value (NPV) 88.1% (95% CI 79.4-93.4), and accuracy 90.8% (95% CI 85.7-94.1). When the diagnosis of APS was accepted according to the revised Sapporo criteria, the sensitivity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria was 77% (95% CI 67.8-84.2), specificity 97.6% (95% CI 91.7-99.3), PPV 97.5% (95% CI 69.3-84.9) and NPV 78.1% (95% CI 69.3-84.9).
Conclusion: The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria have low sensitivity and high specificity compared to the revised Sapporo APS classification criteria. The increase in specificity is due to risk assessment in thromboses and strict obstetric and laboratory criteria.
Downloads
Abstract 121
PDF Downloads 33
Suppl. Files Downloads 27
HTML Downloads 7
References
2. Depietri L, Veropalumbo MR, Leone MC, Ghirarduzzi A. Antiphospholipid Syndrome: State of the Art of Clinical Management. Cardiovascular Drugs & Therapy. 2023.
3. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, Lockshin MD, Branch DW, Piette JC, Brey R, Derksen R, Harris EN, Hughes GR, Triplett DA, Khamashta MA. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1999;42:1309-1311.
4. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, PG DEG, Koike T, Meroni PL, Reber G, Shoenfeld Y, Tincani A, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Krilis SA. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 2006;4:295-306.
5. Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, Naden R, Hendry A, Manneville F, Amigo MC, Amoura Z, Andrade D, Andreoli L, Artim-Esen B, Atsumi T, Avcin T, Belmont HM, Bertolaccini ML, Branch DW, Carvalheiras G, Casini A, Cervera R, Cohen H, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Crowther M, de Jesus G, Delluc A, Desai S, De Sancho M, Devreese KM, Diz-Kucukkaya R, Duarte-Garcia A, Frances C, Garcia D, Gris JC, Jordan N, Leaf RK, Kello N, Knight JS, Laskin C, Lee AI, Legault K, Levine SR, Levy RA, Limper M, Lockshin MD, Mayer-Pickel K, Musial J, Meroni PL, Orsolini G, Ortel TL, Pengo V, Petri M, Pons-Estel G, Gomez-Puerta JA, Raimboug Q, Roubey R, Sanna G, Seshan SV, Sciascia S, Tektonidou MG, Tincani A, Wahl D, Willis R, Yelnik C, Zuily C, Guillemin F, Costenbader K, Erkan D, Collaborators AEACC. The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75:1687-1702.
6. Pengo V, Tripodi A, Reber G, Rand JH, Ortel TL, Galli M, De Groot PG, Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the S, Standardisation Committee of the International Society on T, Haemostasis. Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection. Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 2009;7:1737-1740.
7. Zhao Y, Huang C, Zhou Y, Qi W, Cai B, Hu C, Song Y, Zhu T, Shi X, Liu X, Wang Q, Tian X, Zhao Y, Zeng X, Li M, Zhao J. Performance Validation of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria in an Antiphospholipid Syndrome Cohort. Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis. 2024.
8. Lu Q, Gan Y, Yao Z, Li C. A diagnostic performance study of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Chinese Collaborative cohort presenting with suspected antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024.
9. Cervera R, Boffa M, Khamashta M, Hughes G. The Euro-Phospholipid project: epidemiology of the antiphospholipid syndrome in Europe. Lupus. 2009;18:889-893.
10. Barbhaiya M, Zuily S, de Jesus G, Branch DW, Erkan D. Reply. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024.
11. Merrill JT, Asherson RA. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006;2:81-89.
12. Vassalo J, Spector N, de Meis E, Rabello LS, Rosolem MM, do Brasil PE, Salluh JI, Soares M. Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study. J Crit Care. 2014;29:533-538.
13. Triplett DA. Many faces of lupus anticoagulants. Lupus. 1998;7 Suppl 2:S18-22.
14. Merrill JT, Shen C, Gugnani M, Lahita RG, Mongey AB. High prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients taking procainamide. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:1083-1088.
15. Dlott JS, Roubey RA. Drug-induced lupus anticoagulants and antiphospholipid antibodies. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2012;14:71-78.
16. Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L. Lupus anticoagulant testing during anticoagulation, including direct oral anticoagulants. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6:e12676.